ISU Presentations – Standing Female Nude (Lani)

I really enjoyed Lani’s visual essay. His creativity flourished in his video and I thought the cinematography was well done. I also thought his analysis of the invalidation of women as people was well explained, which reflects his confidence in presenting speeches. His discussion section was also done well, his answers staying relevant to the given questions.

24/30

Advertisements
ISU Presentations – Standing Female Nude (Lani)

Hamlet: Looking Back

Did you enjoy Hamlet? What was one major lesson learned throughout this unit?  

Personally, I thought that Hamlet was an interesting play, once I delved deeper into the themes of the play. With the help of the TOK connections we made, I learned that an action’s consequences will inevitably be uncertain due to the volatile nature of each and every individual’s morality. Hamlet’s internal conflict of inaction and action was left unsolved, and he instead adapted a laissez-faire mindset. It is also interesting how much I was able to relate to Hamlet.

Hamlet: Looking Back

HAMLET ACT III ANALYSIS

What did you learn from each presentation (including your own)? What did you enjoy the most about each presentation? What did you enjoy the least about each presentation?

I learned from Andrea and Lani’s presentation that angry can lead to impulsive actions that most certainly garner negative consequences. I enjoyed their modernized “To be or not to be” soliloquy, which was well-scripted and relevant to the context of the play. I also enjoyed their diorama, using colour to represent the difference emotions of each of the characters during the Dumb Play. I least enjoyed the TOK connection discussion, as I did not have a very deep and thought-out answer to their TOK questions.

HAMLET ACT III ANALYSIS

HAMLET ACT II ANALYSIS

What did you learn from each presentation (including your own)? What did you enjoy the most about each presentation? What did you enjoy the least about each presentation?

From doing this presentation I learned that the way a person behaves does not imply they are the appearance they put out to be. I enjoyed that my presentation was very informative, but the time it took to give an almost line-by-line analysis of over 600 lines was not enjoyable.

HAMLET ACT II ANALYSIS

TOK Connection CATCHUP (Apr 21-22,25-26)

Thursday April 21st – Is there an afterlife?

Knowledge of an afterlife can never be deduced in physical form because one cannot enter it without leaving their life. Nonetheless, an individual has their own judgement on whether or not life after death is real. Personally, I am on the tipping point of either opinion, because as much as I fear the unknowns that is afterlife, but I also wouldn’t want just my life to be my entirety especially if I don’t live as long as I expect too (knock on wood).

Friday April 22nd – Can you truly know someone?

When one is born, they are completely new, thus they come to create their own identity as they grow older. One cannot discover who they are without the help of an external environment. Also, one is prone to changing over time, so their identity is never concrete. One’s identity is the product of their personal experiences, which are never exactly the same between separate individuals. Although people can come to connect with each other, they can only do so to an extent. Even those who are intimate grow independently. So essentially, one can never truly know someone.

Monday April 25th – Can we really know whether our actions will have the consequences we expect them to have?

One’s conscience allows them to assess the consequences of their every action, but these consequences are only predictions of what could actually happen. The ability to know an action’s consequences also depends on the action itself. If it’s too spontaneous, for example, the outcomes are more uncertain. It also depends on how careful the person acting upon this is. A person can be either filled with anxiety or apathetic with impulsiveness when they do something. The undeniable aftermath of an action is therefore debatable.

Tuesday April 26th – How did the trip help your progress in the English program?

This trip to the Spoken Word Workshop at Harbourfront was a helpful learning experience. It was a great way to practice for our IOC/D. Although I didn’t recite my quickly-written poems (which I’m glad since I was sick), I still was able to share the spotlight with a group for the “Generation _” poems. I think with this workshop, I am one step closer to being ready for my commentary.

TOK Connection CATCHUP (Apr 21-22,25-26)

How can we know for certain the facts of a crime that has no witnesses?

In a realistic world, there are many criminal cases that are left unsolved. The verdict of these cases that were undecided by the involved investigators, police, experts become open for discussion to the public. A relevant example is the case of Elisa Lam. There are many conspiracies that were deduced to explain how she died. But as the only evidence of her prior to her death was security camera footage, there is no concrete fact to how she truly died. Was it a homicide? A suicide? There are cases that will forever be left to the unknown, so it is in the hands of the people to decide if a theory holds truth to the scene of a crime.

How can we know for certain the facts of a crime that has no witnesses?

Why do humans hesitate to act?

As a child, one inherits the morals of their parents, as the ability to reason is a human characteristic that is different in every individual. If a child does an action considered unethical, they are scolded or punished. This discipline conditions the child so that they think before they do. This explains why humans are hesitant to act, because there is a need to assess the consequences of an action, especially the fact that everyone has a different opinion. 

Why do humans hesitate to act?